I don't really think I could tie
down one theory of narrative for an author. I believe to do so would be to
commit the fallacy. But, after
thinking about your question, I have been thinking about all of the short
stories I have read whose events I don't necessarily know to be constituent or
supplementary events while reading, but then as I end the story, the events
fall into place. These are the stories that catch. These are the stories that I
end with “Aha. I see what you did there.”
Patricia Highsmith is one of these
writers. When reading a story like “The Terrapin,” part of the magic of the
experience is the simultaneous reading and figuring. Where is his father? Is
that important? How old is Victor? Oh, he’s 11. Is that important? She tossed
the turtle into boiling water. How fast? Oh. nevermind.
Deciphering which are constituent
events and which are supplementary events is part of the puzzling of the
reading itself. Is that a feature of gothic stories? I experience the same
while reading a Flannery O’ Connor story. Or an Edgar Allan Poe story. I have
more thinking to do on this front. And that seems to be the fun of narrative
theory.
Günlük ev günlük ev, kiralık ev, istanbul günlük ev günlük ev ilanları.
ReplyDelete