A classmate and I were
having a discussion about what we felt were the least useful theories we have
read/learned/discussed this semester. We
both feel strongly that the feminist slant on narrative has not gone far enough.
I am certain she will write her own opinion and it will, undoubtedly, look
different than mine. We are both feminists, but have very different
considerations therein, because, shocker, feminists don't all look at story
through the same lens. That’s the wonder, for me, of feminist theories. Very
often the theorizing is messy as hell. One must be able to hold ambiguity in their very
hand in order to consider the theories and the academic and activist arguments
therein. That is a hallmark of much feminist theory, for me. And it is
wondrous.
But those doing feminist
work through narrative theory OR, and I don't know which they consider
themselves doing, those trying to bend narrative theory with a feminist perspective
have so far seemed to remain in the safe and often less vulnerable waters of
primarily white feminist theory. That’s a tragedy. There is so much more. And it is wondrous. And, my point in this
post is to strongly urge that the more is absolutely important. Important
absolutely.
In defining a corporeal
narratology, Daniel Punday writes of some of the misguided thinking about bodies
in narrative. For example he points to what should be an outdated consideration
of narrative and reading, the concept that “Not only do we escape from the body
while reading, but the experience of that escape, the suspension of
corporeality, is part of what makes reading pleasurable” (V11). Do we really
leave our bodies behind? Can we ever really leave our bodies behind? Especially
considering that our identities are so closely connected to our embodiment. Punday
suggests, “narrative, then first and foremost depends upon a corporeal
hermeneutics – a theory of how the text can be meaningfully articulated through
the body” (15). Punday also notes that much feminist narratology work so far is
guilty of essentializing. Essentializing, as many feminist/womanist theorists
have proven, is dangerous and re-inscribes marginalization.
I wonder aloud . . . How
do we move away from such an essentializing way of looking to bodies and
identities as presented in narratives without looking deeper into the feminist theories,
like womanist theory, that speaks to embodiment? Important absolutely.
No comments:
Post a Comment